To someone just getting familiar with both front-end frameworks, it would seem that both have an almost identical collection of pre-built features. It all comes down to personal preferences and comfort levels: If you’re a fan of working with pixels, then Bootstrap is the framework for you! When you use pixels, you’ll have to specifically set the width, height, padding and margin of components and their nested elements on each target device and screen size you’re working with. That’s something to consider, especially in this day and age of responsive design.Īt the end of the day, though, don’t beat yourself up too much about the distinction between the two. Think of pixels as absolute units while rems are relative units. While pixels may feel more familiar to web designers and graphic artists without that much experience, rems help designers think more about proportions. Again, it’s a personal preference thing for web designers. There are clear differences between the two, yet both can create the same outcomes. When it comes to calculating typography, widths and basically everything else, Bootstrap relies on pixels, but Foundation uses rems. row-fluid instead, the width relies on percentages (just like Foundation). This means that it’s going to give you static-sized widths that’ll recede when the viewport is at its limit.
Bootstrap’s default grid mode is attached to breakpoints. Both Bootstrap and Foundation come with a default grid system that’s totally in your hands to customize with Less and Sass, respectively. Now let’s talk flexible and pre-defined grids. Even so, the syntax for building grids can be a tad different, which means that personal preference will be the decider in the end.
Bootstrap vs foundation vs skeleton code#
Alternately, you can remove center columns by using the center columns syntax.ĭesigners have the ability to produce equivalent code snippets in both frameworks that function almost in the same way. In addition, Foundation also makes it a cinch to quickly collapse columns as well as remove gutters because of the collapse class. It’s called the block grid, and it empowers designers to efficiently divide the contents of unordered lists into a grid that’s evenly spaced. Still, there are a couple of specific grid features in Foundation worth mentioning. In other words, any slight advantage that Foundation had at the beginning with its grid system is pretty much gone now. However, after some time, Bootstrap caught up and has closed the gap. Foundation initially made its name with the grid system, being the first of the two frameworks not just to go responsive, but also to really flesh out the mobile-first approach for a period of time. With a grid system, designers are able to prototype various layouts and then make any necessary adjustments as they see fit. The most noticeable part of a front-end framework is its grid system. We want you to be armed with all of the latest information about each framework, so that you can make the best decision for your web-design projects. That said, Bootstrap was created by former Twitter employees while Foundation is the brainchild of ZURB, an interaction design company that can boast a client list that includes eBay, Facebook and even the NYSE. At the end of this blog post, you’ll make a decision on which is better based on your unique situation, your needs and your familiarity with code in the first place. Foundation! Which should I use? Which can get me to where I have a fully functioning, new website more efficiently? Relax-we’ve got you covered.īefore we dive into the details of each framework, know that each one has its pros and cons.
In your mind, you’re probably also thinking…Bootstrap vs.
That’s because these are the two most popular frameworks around right now. If you’re a web designer who’s looking for a sleek, simple and responsive front-end framework, you’ve probably heard of both Bootstrap and Foundation.
0 kommentar(er)
